<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Coveo Enterprise Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.francisrobichaud.com/index.php/2007/01/26/coveo-enterprise-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.francisrobichaud.com/index.php/2007/01/26/coveo-enterprise-search/</link>
	<description>Getting there ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 12:25:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skaber</title>
		<link>http://www.francisrobichaud.com/index.php/2007/01/26/coveo-enterprise-search/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Skaber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 21:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.francisrobichaud.com/index.php/2007/01/26/coveo-enterprise-search/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>IBM and Yahoo based their product on a java open source crawler. When you need performances and quick computation through a file system, I don&#039;t think that java is the right option. Also, Coveo was built to integrate easily into a Microsoft environment and respect it&#039;s security layer. I&#039;m not sure Omnifind does that job as well as Coveo does.
Please take a moment to deploy both applications and browse through all of the configuration possibilies offered by Coveo, you&#039;ll see that Omnifind is way far behind. I am absolutely sure that benchmarks would also be better with Coveo&#039;s Enterprise Search.
These guys know the market and have no reason to be afraid of Omnifind or other competitors in the Enterprise Search industry for Microsoft environments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IBM and Yahoo based their product on a java open source crawler. When you need performances and quick computation through a file system, I don&#8217;t think that java is the right option. Also, Coveo was built to integrate easily into a Microsoft environment and respect it&#8217;s security layer. I&#8217;m not sure Omnifind does that job as well as Coveo does.<br />
Please take a moment to deploy both applications and browse through all of the configuration possibilies offered by Coveo, you&#8217;ll see that Omnifind is way far behind. I am absolutely sure that benchmarks would also be better with Coveo&#8217;s Enterprise Search.<br />
These guys know the market and have no reason to be afraid of Omnifind or other competitors in the Enterprise Search industry for Microsoft environments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.francisrobichaud.com/index.php/2007/01/26/coveo-enterprise-search/comment-page-1/#comment-1</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.francisrobichaud.com/index.php/2007/01/26/coveo-enterprise-search/#comment-1</guid>
		<description>Coveo is yet anoter boolean type search engine, like if the world needs another.  Look at IBM and Yaho&#039;s search if you want boolean.  There are also plenty of freeware.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coveo is yet anoter boolean type search engine, like if the world needs another.  Look at IBM and Yaho&#8217;s search if you want boolean.  There are also plenty of freeware.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
